Comments on: Failed AMC4 Satellite Replaced with AMC2 http://www.omegasource.com/2008/03/28/failed-amc4-satellite-replaced-with-amc2/ Your Resource For Satellite TV - 403-287-7344 Sun, 20 May 2012 08:20:51 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.3 by: Admin http://www.omegasource.com/2008/03/28/failed-amc4-satellite-replaced-with-amc2/#comment-13715 Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:22:20 +0000 http://www.omegasource.com/2008/03/28/failed-amc4-satellite-replaced-with-amc2/#comment-13715 Depending on your geographical location you will need a different size dish. I use 33 inch and sometimes I have problems with reception, but 36 inches work fine in my area. If you are further north then 40 inch will be better. Lnbf it is Ku Standard. Depending on your geographical location you will need a different size dish.
I use 33 inch and sometimes I have problems with reception, but 36 inches work fine in my area. If you are further north then 40 inch will be better.
Lnbf it is Ku Standard.

]]> by: max van herk http://www.omegasource.com/2008/03/28/failed-amc4-satellite-replaced-with-amc2/#comment-13662 Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:10:18 +0000 http://www.omegasource.com/2008/03/28/failed-amc4-satellite-replaced-with-amc2/#comment-13662 which disc and antenne head for reception of AMC-4 are required? which disc and antenne head for reception of AMC-4 are required?

]]> by: Reg Gale http://www.omegasource.com/2008/03/28/failed-amc4-satellite-replaced-with-amc2/#comment-9779 Sun, 08 Mar 2009 20:21:59 +0000 http://www.omegasource.com/2008/03/28/failed-amc4-satellite-replaced-with-amc2/#comment-9779 Could you tell me if this change-out of amc4 to amc2 effects our Glorystar system, or is this strictly for c-band only... The reason I ask is, we are experiencing some low sig. and quality readings on our system for the past week or so... Thank you Reg Could you tell me if this change-out of amc4 to amc2 effects our Glorystar system, or is this strictly for c-band only… The reason I ask is, we are experiencing some low sig. and quality readings on our system for the past week or so… Thank you
Reg

]]> by: Admin http://www.omegasource.com/2008/03/28/failed-amc4-satellite-replaced-with-amc2/#comment-6959 Thu, 29 May 2008 23:27:55 +0000 http://www.omegasource.com/2008/03/28/failed-amc4-satellite-replaced-with-amc2/#comment-6959 Thank for the comment and correction of our incorrect information. Thank for the comment and correction of our incorrect information.

]]> by: Rocco Fanucci http://www.omegasource.com/2008/03/28/failed-amc4-satellite-replaced-with-amc2/#comment-6956 Thu, 29 May 2008 19:07:44 +0000 http://www.omegasource.com/2008/03/28/failed-amc4-satellite-replaced-with-amc2/#comment-6956 The AMC-4 satellite has not &#34;failed,&#34; nor does it have any &#34;battery issues.&#34; No trouble tickets or service complaints were received by SES AMERICOM <a href="http://www.ses-americom.com/americom_2008/siteSections/press_room/press_releases/04_03_08.php" rel="nofollow"> since the move in March</a>. &#160; Coverage and power levels are basically the same for CONUS: &#160; The AMC-4 satellite has not "failed," nor does it have any "battery issues."

No trouble tickets or service complaints were received by SES AMERICOM

since the move in March.
 
Coverage and power levels are basically the same for CONUS:

 

]]>